Wind turbines that are strategically placed around the would harvest wind energy 24/7 with out using a drop of oil except say for the occasional maintenance crew that has to drive up to the turbine.
Which candidate will push us further and harder in to the new age where we don’t depend so much on foreign oil.
More Pages:
- Solar Turbines: How Many Wind Turbines And Solar Panels Does The World Need To Replace Coal, Oil And Nuclear Power? (9/30/2011)
- Solar Turbines: Wind Turbines? (5/21/2011)
- Solar Turbines: What Forms Of Energy And Energy Transformations Are Involved In Wind Turbines? (6/15/2011)
- Solar Turbines: Has The President Read My Letter About The Problems With The Country And My Proposed Solutions? (6/19/2011)
- Solar Turbines: People Who Know About Solar Power And Wind Turbines? (6/13/2011)
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
McCain probably will, but it will be easier for Obama.
however, keep in mind, there are times when the wind is not blowing.
the pics are of the altamont pass in calif.
if i recall correctly, there are something like 3000+ turbines there.
however, there are times when there just is not enough wind to turn them.
From what I’ve seen Democrats seem to be pushing harder for clean energy than the Republicans have. From what I’ve seen on the 2 candidates, O’Bama seems to be going in the direction I want to see the country go.
Sorry but the h-axis turbines that our gvt and private companies are building everywhere may produce some energy, but this form of turbine will not provide enough for our demands. There are tidal generators (use the ocean tides) that can produce much more and cost much less and don’t impact the environment nearly as much, however, if you don’t see them, then you don’t think the gvt is doing anything. Also, it is a case of “first foot in the door” with these generators. H-Axis have to shut down at specific speeds and don’t capture nearly enough of the wind energy to make them truly efficient.