Thus, killing two birds with one stone. It could be financed by NASA’s budget and wind power investors with government assistance.
Airborne wind turbines can be attached and reattached to accommodate space vehicles, since they can stay aloft with their own power.
Since wind turbines function more efficiently at higher elevations, but require a tether . It seems to e that the tether could be multi functional and shared by both technologies.
NOPLATE:–Yes I read about the nanotubes, but I thought they had already worked it out. —My bad, but I hope they can pull it off.
I read that LiftPort was able to send a naotube tether up 1000 ft., and is confident that they can go a mile. Still a long way to go, but hopeful.
BLAMAY:—Intreasting. —Can you explain how the electricity is produced ?
(Sp) interesting.
More Pages:
- Solar Turbines: Where Would Be Good And Reasonable Places To Put Wind Turbines To Produce Energy In CHICAGO? (7/9/2011)
- Solar Turbines: What Is One Advantage Of Using Wind Turbines Rather Than Burning Fossil Fuels To Produce Electricity? (7/22/2011)
- Solar Turbines: What Are The Drawbacks To Using Wind Turbines Or Solar Panels For Providing All Power To A Home? (4/24/2011)
- Solar Turbines: Wind Turbines.? (5/19/2011)
- Solar Turbines: How Many Wind Turbines Would You Need To Give Off The Energy Of A Nuclear Power Plant? (8/28/2011)
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
A perfectly good idea. Thumbs up.
Conceivably, yes. The problem of course is the space elevator itself. We have no known material capable of supporting its own weight over the distance required to build such an elevator… and no techniques for building it if we did. There’s been a lot of talk about carbon nanotubes, but even then, we’re just not there yet. Note “yet”. It’s a fascinating concept and worth exploring, though. So why not slap a few wind generators to it?
A tether in space would produce its own electricity. This experiment was tried on one of the shuttle missions with a quarter mile tether and the energy it produced was phenomenal. The tether alone would produce more energy than wind generators attached to it.
I’m not quite sure but it has something to do with the difference of speed of one end of the tether and the other. Somehow it produces a large difference in charge from one end to the other. They said a tether so many miles long itself could easily power the city of new york if I remember correctly. Do a search for the term “shuttle tether”.
As I remember, it was a mishap with an experiment and when they found the flaw, it was some form of hi electrical current that burnt and melted the tether while testing a satellite.
http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=1122
Balloons raised up to one kilometer make more sense than elevator towers. The service life would have to be at least one year, but that seems feasible. The air pressure could be maintained with a small motor. Solar panels and batteries could also be used to acheive optimum positioning.
Safety would be a problem for air traffic, but no-fly zones are already in the controller’s computers. The major problem will be storms. The stress on the tether would be enormous in a tornado. Who want’s to be responsible for the damage caused by a falling windmill? With enough warning, maybe the balloons could be grounded quickly enough.
Of course, that problem exists for towers as well – and you easily can’t bring down a tower.